On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 16:40:55 -0600, Cecil Moore
wrote:

Richard Clark wrote:
It's not like you have actually pointed to any specific datum that was
in error.

If you believe that, you have your blinders on, which
any rational person already knew. A 3 ns delay through
a 2" dia, 100T, 10" coil at 4 MHz is impossible!!! Is
that specific enough for you?

Your data was more eloquent. Gad! you must hate it as much as you
avoid its mention.

Unfortunately, in the last 127 postings ...

You are responsible for half of those. I predicted
that you were going to complain about my number of
postings engineered by you and I was right.

After the bruising testimony of your own measurement, you certainly
needed some victory. :-)

Um, does your personal tragedy lead anywhere? I'm not interested in
reading the repetition of "impossible" being cried into your pillow.
Certainly you still have time to rummage up something lost in the
folds and recesses of that MENSA approved mind. Tom and your results
could have happened with Arthur's principle of antigravity, couldn't
it? That doesn't need anymore proof than your plaintive wails into
the cold void of an uncaring universe.

Roy and the others call this "last man standing." Myself, I would say
it is what the law calls an attractive nuisance - and barring
correspondence with any technical content, it is far more fun. Your
legacy is that for many, this is your ONLY exposure.

You want to be last? Hug Tom and pull the pin!