On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 13:22:36 -0600, Cecil Moore
wrote:

Richard Clark wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote:
I have spelled out the desired phases three times now.
This will be the forth time.

Fourth. (You suffer from spelling as well as logic, theory, math...
errors.

My spell checker didn't catch that one.

Well, for an admitted MENSA member (or lapsed member, which gives the
impression of a limp pendant) also having troubles in catching math
errors, or confused dualities; then it stands you must also be warned
a spell checker doesn't validate syntax, nor the validity of
expression.

As I know you stumble over English, I will put it in Texican:
"Random math does not validate irrational theory;
Xeroxed words littered on the page does not sell snake oil."
(OK, so it is more like cowboy couplet haiku.)

I knew it was
only a matter of time until you stooped to complaining
about my spelling,

Netzheimers remission is clearing the fog, is it?

close to as low as a person can
stoop. Your ulterior motive here is clear to all.

"All" seem to be very few (except for those chuckling in the wings).

*** So, moving back to the technical side of the balance sheet. ***

No problems with my math assuming the square law computation of your
recall at -1.94dB? I thought you might want to boost it to 19/20ths
with having to only say it once and suffer a recall of -0.45dB.

Was that a new low? This exterior motive was especially formulated
for your the sake of your depressed recall response curve. ;-)

So that you can preserve your dignity - I will leave you the last
word. And remember, always leave them laughing (think of it as
another theory you are introducing).