 
			
				December 25th 07, 05:10 AM
			
			
			
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
	
		  
	 | 
	
		
		
		
			
			| 
				
				 external usenet poster 
				
				
			 | 
			  | 
			
				
					First recorded activity by RadioBanter: May 2007 
					
					
					
						Posts: 97
					 
					
					
					
					
					     
				 
			 | 
		 
		 
		
	 | 
	
	
		
	
		
		
			
			
				 
				 Collins' Curtain Array
			 
			 
			
		
		
		
			
			
"J. Mc Laughlin"  wrote in message  
...  
 Dear Antenna Group:   Here is an antenna question.    December 24, 2007 
 
 On the cover of the Winter 2007 QCWA Journal one may see three pictures of  
 antennas used by Collins Radio. Two of the pictures feature a circular  
 array of six curtain antennas. In other words, the array is expected to  
 effect six beams - one every 60 degrees. 
 
 The curtain part of the array is straight forward. The six antennas that  
 are in front of each curtain are new to me. It is my hope that an  
 explanation will be forthcoming about how the front antennas "work." 
 
 Curtain description: Six, triangular, lattice towers of uniform cross  
 section are placed equally on the circumference of a circle and guyed in  
 four places. At least 52 (equally spaced in a vertical plane) horizontal  
 wires are stretched between adjacent towers and the horizontal wires  
 appear to be insulated from the towers at their ends. No noticeable sag is  
 seen. A crude estimate suggests the towers are something like 80 to 100  
 feet high. 
 
 Front antennas: 17 horizontal doublets, all of essentially the same  
 length, and all in a vertical plane that is parallel to the associated  
 curtain emanate from a tubular mast placed in front of each curtain. [It  
 is well known to place fat, horizontal dipoles in a broadside  
 configuration in front of a curtain consisting of horizontal wires. At  
 least part of the Collins' array does not look like anything I have seen  
 before.] What I see has mirror symmetry with respect to a doublet that is  
 in the middle of the mast. I assume that the antenna is fed with a  
 balanced transmission line connected to the middle doublet. Above and  
 below the middle doublet is seen exactly the same collection of doublets  
 fed with a balanced transmission line.. 
 
 Starting with the middle doublet and proceeding upward a distance that I  
 call 3X, one encounters a collection of seven, equally spaced doublets  
 (spaced X apart). The bottom of the group of seven is seen to be fed with  
 a balanced transmission line coming from the middle doublet. A balanced  
 transmission line is seen emanating from the top doublet of the group of  
 seven for a distance 3X to an isolated doublet at the top of the mast. 
 
 If one were to ignore the groups of seven (one above the middle doublet  
 and one below the middle doublet) one would have an antenna of three  
 doublets in broadside with the likelihood of 1:2:1 factors so as to  
 minimize lobes. The groups of seven could comprise two "elements" in  
 broadside. Here is one additional fact about each group of seven: while  
 the top and bottom doublet (of each group of seven) clearly have an  
 attached balanced transmission line (one comes from the middle doublet and  
 the other goes to a distal, solo doublet), the group of seven appear to be  
 connected by a "butterfly" of what may be mesh (because one can see  
 through the butterfly). 
 
 The butterfly is simple, but not easy to describe. It is two isosceles  
 triangles with their bases vertical and outward from the mast, and with  
 the apex of each triangle appearing to touch the mast at the middle  
 doublet of the group of seven. I estimate the height (base to apex) of  
 each half to be about X. I assume that the mesh of the butterfly is  
 connected to each of the doublets of the group of seven. 
 
 So, who might be able to explain this? 
 
 73,     Mac    N8TT 
 --  
 J. McLaughlin;  Michigan, USA 
 Home:  
Sounds like a good antenna to try - except the XYL will really make herself  
an "ex" after seeing the array. Some of those XYLs just don't understand!
		  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 |