On Jan 1, 10:42*am, Cecil Moore wrote:
Keith Dysart wrote:
Odd. Cecil has not named his "references" which is
quite unusual for he truly likes to name-drop: Ramo,
Whinnery, Hecht, IEEE, ...

I get ragged on for giving too many references and
not giving enough references. You guys please make
up your minds.

A reference backing up your claim that a well-defined
source impedance can not be used to compute transient
reflections at the source would be entirely appropriate.

And you might find googling '"lattice diagram" reflection'
to assist in understanding the counter-claim.

...Keith