Keith Dysart wrote:
A reference backing up your claim that a well-defined
source impedance can not be used to compute transient
reflections at the source would be entirely appropriate.

I made no such claim. My claim is that *your* source
is *NOT* well-defined and is just a result of your
hand-waving fantasies. When you stop refusing to
provide a schematic, we can discuss whether it is
well-defined or not.

Again, I freely admit that you can leap tall buildings
at a single bound in your mind.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com