Keith Dysart wrote:
The presence of this poster providing misleading
information makes this group a rather unique learning
environment.

But a learning experience nonetheless. All one has
to do regarding false information is to produce
valid technical references to the contrary.

Ad hominem attacks are not technical references
and the mere assertion that the information is
misleading implies some level of omniscience in
the asserter that is not in evidence.

For the record: The only controversial assertion
that I have ever made is that coherent EM wave
cancellation can cause a redistribution of the
EM energy in the opposite direction in a transmission
line. No one has proved that assertion to be wrong.

A couple of technical web pages assert that wave
cancellation can be the cause of a redistribution
of photonic energy to areas that allow constructive
interference.

Since there is only one other direction available
in a transmission line, the constructive interference
must occur in the opposite direction from the
direction of wave cancellation.

That seems like a no-brainer to me.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com