Standing-Wave Current vs Traveling-Wave Current
On 4 Jan, 10:31, "Dave" wrote:
art spewed:
snip
A radiator in equilibrium is a full wave length
long ago, and far away... well maybe a couple months, and still in this
group, you said 1/2 wave was the equilibrium size? *so which is it, full
wave or half wave? *and where did gauss go?? *how do these funny cosmic dust
things fit into his equation??
David
you are quite correct in that I do fluctuate between a full wave
length and a half wave length antenna which is obviously wrong. My
problem in describing a wave length is to consider it in electric
terms thus a physical halfwave radiator is electrically a full wave
antenna since it handles one period. Ofcourse I should use standard
terminology and refer to physical length
even tho it is not exactly correct to my mind because it actually
varies in the real world where as electrical length doesn't. However,
I should stay with the accepted terminology to the best of my ability
even tho I believe that is why this arguement on colliding current is
realising postings and mass confusion in excess of 1000 each time it
comes up. I apologise for misleading terminolgy.
With reference to Gauss.
This is my starting point where with the addition of a time variable
to the static law became the same as Maxwells laws where Gauss formula
was firmly in theIsaac Newton camp
by revolving around gravitational fields.
funny cosmic dust come into the equation
Cosmic or galactic dust is everywhere on this earth .m. This dust is
what Gauss refers to
as static particles in a gravitational field in equilibrium. Thus I
was able to add elements to this field as long as the elements were in
equilibrium, together with a time vaying addition which brings it into
Maxwells court. This transition to a dynamic form then allows the use
of computor programs based only around Maxwells laws. Thus radiators
and arrays could be designed based on a equilibrium format instead of
a planar format as with a Yagi using existing standard computor
radiator design programs. From the results the following becomes
correct i.e A radiator can be any shape, size or elevation as long it
is in aquilibrium
and made from a diamagnetic material. Thus now helix radiators would
have to have counter windings to fall with in these parameters, where
the present helical antennas are absent the contra wound windings. All
this is what Prof Hattely was looking for in combining the EH field
which is unsuccesfull as is the latest RI antenna. None of these
inventors followed the same trail that I did that revealed the
equilibrium requirement for contra wound coil additions. Ask any other
questions that you have difficulty with. As an aside, this was what
Einstein was looking for during his last twenty years of life under
the title of a Grand Unification theory but without success
Regards
Art Unwin....KB9MZ
|