On 6 Jan, 11:01, art wrote:
Gentlemen
Radio is about fields , waves, inductors e.t.c and diamagnetic
materials which does not include iron.!
So to refer to the magnetic field of iron has nothing to do with
radio. For antennas we use diamagnetic materials which have a skin.
None of these, when a current is passed thru them ,allows a field to
be formed on the inside like a iron magnet ! So gentlemen, get back to
basics and review what a field looks like under these circumstances. I
am not going to tell you because your niche in life is to argue,
so check things out for yourself. * *Think academicaly or in a
scientific fashion instead of CB ers
And another thing. All laws are bound to the focal point of
equilibrium. When there is not a state of equilibrium you have varying
waves which do not appear when equilibrium is present.
So be specific if you are refering to a non equilibrium status since
all laws must be modified to account for this. Otherwise, your debates
will go on for years and years and years without closure
Art Unwin KB9MZ......xg(uk)

Seems like the people on this side of the pond only got educated to
the level of their professors. So guys listen up.
When a current flows in a piece of iron it exhibites a field that is
representive of the north and south pole. Iron is referred to as a
ferrite matererial. When a current passes over a diamagnetic material
the field is representitive of a diamatic pole within the earth. This
pole is at a different angle to the ferrite pole and is also quite
weak. It is readily seen in action with a pendulum as it induces a
curve to its movement as it goes backwards and forwards. It moves more
erraticall when a eclipse occurs because tho the action tho weak is
enhanced the ferrite pole from out space is somewhat shielded and thus
magnifies the identification of the diamagnetic anti gravity forces.
This anti gravitational force can also create levitation, but is
really known as the offcenter force of our earth that turns the earth
around.
Now if you review the Corriolis effect or the Casmire effect you will
see that these are the effect created by poles other that that of
ferrite.
So now to a radio antenna. Surely you are aware that a capacitor
discharge moves towards a inductive field where at the same time it
sweeps up the static particles that have come to rest after entering
th atsmosphere (predominately during the active sunspot cycle.) When
the swarm or plasma cloud gets to the inductance it only accepts
charged electrons to make up a field. This field is a
antigravitational field that is oriented differently from a ferrite
magnetic field. The field orientation thus guides what was the inate
static particles into a curling action away from our antenna.This same
action is in fact is called a curl vector when one determines the
resultant vector of forces that emanate from a time varient field,
which also is not parallel to the axis of the current flow.
Remember that this multi particle sweeping action occurs a million
times for each megacycle of operation so there is a constant series of
pulses or plasma stream moving away from the antenna. Each of these
particles placed a reactive force upon the antenna such that with the
abundance of
particles by virtue of the numourous samples supplied creates an
occillating action on the radiator. This same sample of forces travels
with the plasm until it finds a diamagnetic material that is resonant
where it can impart the same occillatory movement on its new resting
place. What is special about the resting place chosen is that only a
dimagnetic material will allow these static particles to rest upon
their surface, because all other materials have retained magnetic
properties as seen when looking at a hysteresis curve.

Now with respect to Amelia Erhardt and the Bermuda triangle. What I
was ponting to was that the axis of the diagmatic pole could well lie
on this very axis where the dimagnetic field would be quite a bit
stronger than elsewhere.
Put into place that both of these areas is surrounded by water which
is also diamagnetic. Think then of a aeroplane made of aluminum
enclosure that exihibits a shielding action as with a eclipse. Could
not one wonder what could happen to a small ferrite sliver used in a
compass when reacting to such circumstances especially when
considering the universal square law? Would a few degrees of movement
on a compass create a situation where a resulting course change would
be made? I know this really has nothing to do with radiation but
well.....you did ask.
Don't take my word for all this . Investigate via Google on all the
phenomina spoken of. Use a computor program with an optimiser and
determine why the radiator is tipped away from being parallel to
earth.
Did equilibrium create an array where the radiators were closer to
each other than a yagi? Check out where the gain difference comes from
when radiators are stacked but with only one feed point. I could go on
ofcourse,but I do recognise that old hams resist change so acceptance
of the above is doomed. Cover the undeniable facts and kick Art from
the group!
Can't do that I keep going and going and....
Art Unwin KB9MZ.....XG (uk)