r.r.a.a WARNING!!!
On 6 Jan, 18:39, "AI4QJ" wrote:
"art" wrote in message
...
"Did you ever think that your post would last this long? Obviously the
regular contributors
in this group cannot handle the truth and thus will not consult
anything.Now the experts are argueing over the term SWR a very, very,
deep discussion revealing things unknown to the amateur community at
this time. [...]"
Hello Art, the concept of SWR is extremely misunderstood even by people with
degrees in electronics engineering. It is assumed to be simple, yet many
people get it wrong. Indeed, a good understanding is essential for antenna
development. I do not fault anyone for not understanding the concept because
standing waves, simple as they may seem, are actually expressed as the
product of a cos wave over distance and a sine wave over time. Many things
are happening over the length of the antenna as the function is operating.
If you think of it, it is the essence of space-time and it may be productive
for you to consider it even more broadly in your own hypotheses, more
broadly that is by possibly incorporating the mechancial SWR analogues to
voltage/current SWR's and who knows what new ideas may come to mind with
your model.
I don't understand a lot of this talk about waves bouncing which is
fortunate. Icould not possibly stay on a thread where everybody is
talking past each other and then changing the subject as they didn't
understand the subject in the first place. In ham radio nothing is
believed if it is contrary to the norm.This bouncing wave thing will
never come to closure as all participants are deaf. As far as me
getting involved all the answers involved in my description of radio
are known facts in the scientific world and fully coroberated. Heck
they are even corroberated by existing antenna computor programs and
actual tests. I can't see how these waves fit in with classical
science so it must be another invented science that it referes to. Now
if the trend changed to debate the voracity of existing accepted data
is proved to be incorrect then they would have my attention but the
group is not competant enough for that trail.
Regards
Art
|