In article ,
D Peter Maus wrote:

Steve wrote:
On Jan 8, 12:01 am, D Peter Maus wrote:
David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
There is no risk in leaving the fight behind.
I would get a good chuckle out of finding out how you think I could
have
remained, given I was escorted to the airport; the intent was to
silence
the radio stations by nationalization, not to silence me personally.
How you would have stayed is not the question. You claim to have
been
a defender of democracy. The question is, as a defender, how you would
risk life and property by leaving.
I did not leave, I was sent out of the country, by an armed escort. I
risked
life and property, lost all my property and barely kept my life.
Changing the subject is another charming debate tactic designed to
get
you out of clarifying a statement that makes no sense.
Once again, making my point for me.
You made no point. "Left the country" sounds voluntary. Removed at
gunpoint
is the reality of the matter.
Again, you make my point for me.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

He seems to make points for everyone except himself. Quite comical,
actually. He's like one of those bizarre types of characters Peter
Sellers would have played.


We could start calling him 'Chauncey."

Oh that's good.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California