View Single Post
  #101   Report Post  
Old January 8th 08, 03:56 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
David Eduardo[_4_] David Eduardo[_4_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,817
Default Yea Eadurdo, radio is a growth-industry and crappy HD radios will save it!


"Steve" wrote in message
...
On Jan 8, 10:18 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

...
On Jan 8, 12:09 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:



Funny how not one station in the market has made an FCC complaint,
listening
levels have not changed, and nobody else has mentioned this.


Plenty of people are talking about it. Perhaps the problem is that no
one is listening.

Describe a couple of these supposedly plentiful cases of NYC stations
being
interferred with inside their interference free contours.


Pick any two NYC AM stations and I'll check them out.

WADO and WCAA.


You can't because there are no cases.


You are incorrect. I'm listening to plenty of them right now.

Unless you are talking about the interference caused by dimmers, computers
and the like (which only affects AM... which is only about 19% of the
listening to radio in NYC), there is no interference.

What is the cause of this alleged interference?


The mere fact that the ratings, which came out 15 minutes ago, show no
changes in listening levels in the NY market, disproves your point.


It's an amazing "rating" that can "disprove" the truth. Very lame even
by your anemic standards.

Were there interference that made radio unpleasant to listen to, the overall
PUR (Persons Using radio) would decline as people listened less or not at
all and picked other forms of entertainment. Ratings also quantify the
number of persons using radio and the time they listen, so any such problem
would be immediately shown.