Cecil Moore wrote:
Jim Kelley wrote:

Cecil Moore wrote:

The energy in
the canceled waves is "redistributed" in the opposite direction
in the transmission line as constructive interference.


But as I said, there is no energy where there are no waves, so the
sentence makes no sense. There is no "energy in canceled waves".


There existed energy in the two waves before they were canceled.

I really don't want to go on ad infinitum about this, but the only
"before" would have been "before" the conditions for wave cancellation
existed.

ac6xg