On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:53:44 -0500, "AI4QJ" wrote:

the wording in your statement above may need
some modification such as:

I think not. What this leads to is Cecilaboration that informs none
of the discussion.

This thread alone could turn into further amendments of what Feynman
authored (and all scrambling to lay intellectual claim for his Oscar).

Simple case in point, it may need some modification such as:
1. accounting for the force of viscosity;
2. accounting for the force of magnetism (ferro, para, and the rest);
3. accounting for the force of gravity;
4. accounting for the force of angular momentum;
5. accounting for the force of local tide;
6. accounting for the force of wind shear;
7. accounting for the force of advertising......

The arguments already filling the tea cup can't even raise the
temperature for a decent brew.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC