On 17 Jan, 18:25, "AI4QJ" wrote:
"art" wrote in message

...

your whole posting is just silly. First you accuse me of lieing now
you want to provoke me with stupidity. You need to upgrade to a
understanding of a tank circuit.Yes, it is used in your transmitter.
Google it and study it. Free speech is great but it also reveals your
mentality. *And you are just bull ****ing in the absence of knoweledge."

OK art, I notice a great improvement in your having only 3 spelling errors
in 5 sentences. You are a fool. If your postings could ever be elevated to
the level of mere stupidity, then it might be possible to correct your
misconceptions. However, one cannot deal with true insanity by any rational
approach such as that. You do not drive me to use Google; you drive me to
dictionary.com so I can find the words appropriate to describe the idiocy of
your ravings. However, it isn't worth the effort so I will leave you mired
in your intellectual wasteland, reading your postings from time to time for
the entertainment value of comic relief. For the sake of *the hobby I will
continue point out the fairy-tale nature of your postings lest the casual
reader of this newsgroup ever get the wrong impression of what the typical
ham radio operator thinks is antenna "theory".

AI4QJ

For entertainment value look for where the photon term came
from.....Quantum theory
which has not been proven. If a particle os in a magnetic field it can
take on some of the properties of that field. To be propelled requires
mass as does a mechanical vibration of a radiator. Yes mechanical laws
equate with electrical laws.The object that was repelled is a mass
with anti gravitational tendencies which allows it to have straight
line trajectory.
That straight line trajectory is of a partical that now has potential
energy received from a magnetic field. That energy becomes Kinetic
energy on impact with a receiving antenna which thus is instrumental
with a multitude of other particles in applying a mechanical force
whose reaction is supplied by the receiving radiator in the form of
vibration. When you are talking radio you are talking MHz which
translates into millions of particles or samples taken by the
receiving antenna, a lot more than your ear can accomplish. The proton
idea was thought up by Einstein in an effort to understand what
radiation is and he died without solving that puzzle.
Einstein made a tremendous amounts of errors in his life time and this
is just one of them.
Ham's look for resonance has the salvation of all but this is just a
ham's point of view. Like a quadratic equation there are two answers
to choose from, but only one that satisfies Newtons requirement for
equilibrium. Ham's choose to recognise just resonance because it is
self serving for amateur operation,but science will always follow the
requirement for equilibrium
just as all the masters did.So many new sciences were invented in an
effort to identify radiation that were not required because the
simplicity Of Gaussian law reflected the true nature of radiation.
You have called me a liar and a fool but are not willing to raise a
few thousand dollars to prove that I do not have a 160M antenna on the
top of my tower, that I am a fool and a liar Money is waiting for you
and your backers just by y showing I do not have a 160M antenna
sitting on my tower. You have some gall to call me names and then
backslide when asked to prove your point.
No, I am not going to insult you, your own actions show what manner of
man you are.
Art Unwin...KB9MZ....xg(uk)