On 17 Jan, 20:43, Dave Heil wrote:
art wrote:
You have called me a liar and a fool but are not willing to raise a
few thousand dollars to prove that I do not have a 160M antenna on the
top of my tower, that I am a fool and a liar Money is waiting for you
and your backers just by y showing I do not have a 160M antenna
sitting on my tower. You have some gall to call me names and then
backslide when asked to prove your point.
No, I am not going to insult you, your own actions show what manner of
man you are.
Art Unwin...KB9MZ....xg(uk)

Art, I've asked you to provide information on your 160m antenna twice
previously. *You referred me to an eham tower of babel after the first
and responded something about not operating on 160 for the second.

I'll ask you for the third time: *Would you explain your 160m antenna
for us? *Do you believe it to be as good or better than a full-sized
inverted L over an extensive radial field? *Have I wasted time, effort
and money in installing my inverted L when an 18 foot antenna would have
done the same job?

Dave K8MN

Dave,
Over the years many have asked that same question and I have answered
it many times.
When ever a newbie comes along they always ask the same question
without looking back at my past posts since they want to argue. Now it
is you who is starting the post with a caustic comment regarding the
"tower of Babel" but at no time have you or any newbie initiated a
discussion before making a insult to follow the crowd. What do you
think I should do when you call my writing "babel"? Now the computor
programs state that a tilted element provides more horizontal gain
than a horizontal element. This was followed up independently on this
newsgroup.No debate regarding the coroberation
So should we all dump the antenna computor programs? Many hams say
they did this or did that and produced better than sliced bread. Hams
respond that you didn't measure on the range properly so give me the
math. I started off with the math which was corroberated by a doctor
working for a space agency. Guess what? He got plastered for "poor"
mathematics.
This group cannot debate any thing which is why only a few dominate
the group now. Past experts have left!So I ask you"how should this
group be run"?
Art