Steve wrote:
On Jan 28, 8:33 am, dxAce wrote:
Steve wrote:
On Jan 28, 2:59 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message
...
dxAce wrote:
Steve wrote:
On Jan 27, 9:53 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message
...
Hey, have the bitch send me a letter, on the firms letterhead. Like
I said
before, I expect to receive it in the next two weeks. Pretty easy,
eh.
'Eduardo'?
You ****ing drunk maniac,
Aw, did dxAce huwt your wittle feewings? Poor wittle Edwawdo....
The faux have no feelings...
Poor little cocksucker just had it handed to him, and he probably doesn't
even
realize it yet...
If you really think that, you are a miserable excuse for a human being and a
disgrace for all those that wore uniforms before and after you.
I gave you a half dozen links showing what my daughter does, when she passed
the bar, a report that shows her as the director of the legal department of
a very large Commonwealth government entity, and even indication of her
scholarship awards.
What reason do we have to believe that this person is your daughter?
You've been caught in numerous lies in this group. Any presumption
that you're telling the truth has consequently gone straight out the
window. The fact that you found someone whose name includes "Gleason"
and is an attorney does not impress. I'm sure there are many of
these.
There is no *daughter*.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Probably not. I find it hard to believe that any self-respecting man
who is the father of children *of any age* would voluntarily and
repeatedly submit to the public reamings he has received here.


I find it hard to believe that any executive with his credentials
would submit to the noise, here.

My GM at CBS used to cruise the AOL Radio boards. He'd answer
questions, he'd clarify policy, and he'd take suggestions. All in a very
public forum. He also took a reaming from time to time.

But that was all part of his 'ground up' marketing effort. And he
participated in boards where his audience was known to frequent. What he
didn't do was show up on radio boards where his audience wasn't found.
He didn't spend time on the non relevant boards, because it created no
benefit to him, his station, and his audience. And he never engaged in
debate for debate's sake. Because his responsibilities didn't permit him
to waste that kind of time. Or effort.

You'd think a ranking executive within a corporation like Univision
wouldn't have the time to submit to the noise here. Especially, given
his disdain for DXers, and the attested non-viability of SW broadcasting.

You gotta wonder.

I'm sure he'll tell us. He can't help himself. Which also suggests
inconsistencies in his story. But I'm sure he'll pop out to clear up any
misunderstandings.

And in the act, raise more questions than he answers.

Which further suggests there's less here than meets the eye.