Tom Horne wrote in
news:gjxoj.14357$fs4.12898@trnddc02:
I will learn whatever I need to in order to be an effective radio
operator when that is what is really needed. I've already set up a
Winlink2000 gateway just to learn how. I've got a portable packet set
up worked out using just an HT, a readily portable TNC, laptop
computer, and a portable J-pole. I'm scheduled for my Skywarn class
and I'm enrolled in the Level 1 Amateur Radio Emergency Communications
course and I plan on taking all three courses and the needed exams to
become a certified emergency communicator. I think I can honestly say
I'm willing to learn.

Okay, Tom, good to hear that. First thing of course is to get the
General license.

Second thing is that HF is a whole different animal than VHF. My
experience with new guys and gals is that they often think of HF/MF as
just another set of frequencies to use. It is and it isn't. Propagation
knowledge is needed, not only on your end of the signal, but on the other
end as well. Working the vagaries of propagation is one of the great joys
of Ham radio, but it requires a pretty big commitment, and an enjoyment
of the game as well. You're going to have to get on the air, and spend a
couple years learning - it isn't going to be like using a computer
program.

HF is an unruly beast, and your antenna is only going to be a small part
of it.

I'm not trying to bust your chops here, it's just a different ball game,
and your post started out like one of those "just tell me what I need to
do" commercials. 8^)

What I was hoping to find was operators who have already used one or
more of the antennas I was asking about who would be willing to share
their experience of the effectiveness or lack of same with me.


My vote is for the general purpose dipole and a tuner. Flexible,
and "all HF band". It will work in multiple locations, (important for an
antenna that must be raised in whatever condx are present) is reasonably
efficient, and works pretty darn well.

- 73 de Mike N3LI -