View Single Post
  #3   Report Post  
Old February 15th 08, 10:48 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
IBOCcrock IBOCcrock is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Aug 2007
Posts: 707
Default WSM's chief engineer on HD Radio

On Feb 15, 3:15�pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"IBOCcrock" wrote in message

...
. The sheer capital

cost of the power increase (if approved) will be staggering
considering most of the current hardware and ancillary equipment will
have to be replaced."


"Where robust in reach, radio is an ailing medium that is undergoing
yet another adjustment to bring expenses inline with revised revenue;
so another big outlay in capital is not likely.


Of all the former 1 A clear channels, WSM is the lowest in billing and the
lowest in market rank. It exists only as a promotion for the Gaylord
enterprises in Nashville, as its ratings place it 14th in the market, and in
billings it is 22nd per a reputable source. For most viable stations in the
top 100 markets, the cost of upgrading to new HD gear is small, and is a
depreciable capital expense item, not a cost. Dogs like WSM will find it
hard to manage, but that is because they are not successful radio stations..


Costs to upgrade run from $100,000 to $600,000 - not small. Plus, the
on-going licensing and HD channel royalty fees. Plus, the new 10db
power increase, if approved, will be staggering, as most equipment
will need replacing. Plus, each new release of hardware upgrade is an
on-going expense, with no return. Nice try! The same applies to those
empty HD radios that aren't selling.