RadioBanter - View Single Post

[email protected] · February 25th 08, 12:03 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave

On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 23:53:52 GMT, Telamon
wrote:

In article ,
wrote:

On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 23:18:19 GMT, Telamon
wrote:

In article ,
wrote:

On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:49:20 -0800 (PST), RHF
wrote:

On Feb 23, 8:16*pm, Telamon
wrote:
In article
,

*RHF wrote:
On Feb 23, 3:56*pm, msg wrote:
-
- *Fromwww.davidgleason.com:

SNIP
-
- Hey clueless, nobody cares about this.
- It has nothing to do with RRS.
-

The entertainment value of your feud has passed; if neither of you is
going to extend an olive branch why don't you at least accept a
cease-fire.

I don't see a positive contribution from you about this.

Very little positive to say about it. Sure, I believe you are more
knowledgeable about radio than RHF and I've often commented on his
godawful writing style and lack of substantive contribution in actual
knowledge. However, either of you could walk away from the feud and
neither of you chooses to.

Now, if you mean positive contribution to be me sticking some barbs in
RHF that would be akin to bayonetting a dead soldier. Or do you wish
I should challenge Eduardo Gleason - again, very little to say that
hasn't been said already.

So, that leaves my one positive contribution as suggesting that the
parties cease their bickering and if you don't find that positive
and/or relevant well that's just too damn bad 'cause I don't play to
you as my primary audience nor do I seek or need your approval of what
I post.

I've tried the non-confrontational approach and that was unsatisfactory.

I need another suggestion.

Semtex?