View Single Post
  #20   Report Post  
Old March 8th 08, 06:07 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
[email protected] nm5k@wt.net is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 757
Default Antenna physical size

On Mar 7, 9:36 pm, Art Unwin wrote:
On Mar 7, 8:32 pm, wrote:

On Mar 7, 5:09 pm, Art Unwin wrote:


David,
You admit to not understanding the term "equilibrium" so what do you
care what I say and in what content.


I don't think anyone here really knows how you define that word
as it pertains to your antenna design.
Once I saw where you said it meant the antenna was resonant,
"eham?" but that seems to change with the direction of the wind
and the amount of snowfall on the ground.
MK


What is your real p;roblem?


Dunno..The price of motor fuel? Ammunition prices keep
going up? My butt itches? I dunno..
I'll ponder this further and get back to you.

You have not seen my antenna and obviously
dont understand the mathematics
and you are not an engineer, Yet you have made so many comments and
opinions that berate the design and seem un willing to wait until the
independent review comes in.


What mathematics? You haven't given any. Not a bit
that I recall. You only talk about winding loads of thin
22 gauge wire onto a form about the size of a shoe box
or two, and and mutter something about a garbage can lid,
and that freaking "E" word over and over..
I guess I missed all the math you providing on this marvel
of engineering.

Who said I can't wait? I'm in no hurry. Take all the time you
want.
If you can turn a turd into a diamond, I'll be the first to applaud.
I'm not going to hold my breath though..

On top of that you want help with the
word equilibrium!.


I'm well aware of how most normal people define the word.
I want to know how you define it.
You use it in nearly every post, but you seem to refuse to
define how it applies to an antenna system.

Give me a break.You should have pursued an education instead of
bragging how often you quit going to school
then you would not appear so ignorant about antennas.


Art, you kill me. At least I have an excuse...
What is yours?

Treat it as a
hobby and forget about the being an expert side of things, for you it
is to late.


I don't need to be an expert to smell a turd.
How come an self proclaimed expert like you can't smell one?

And yes the antenna is resonant but rezonance does not
always equate to equilibrium.


Well, does it always equate to?
This may or may not be a trick question...
This is a fine example of the silly crap you pull that compels
me to tweak your differential every once in a while.
You can't answer a straight question without using some form
of bafflegab to try to confuse the questioner, or to imply
that he/she must surely be brain dead to even ask the
question in the first place.

With respect to feeding a small antenna it is not that difficult
especially if you choose a resonance of 50 ohm
resistive.


How are you going to choose this value when the 160m antenna
is the size of a shoebox? Seems to me you are going to get
what you get, and then have to match to it.
If your design is that small and requires no matching...
Oh, forget it...
Art, you are killing me with your voodoo logic.. I succumb..

With respect to your world beating antenna that is so easy
when you get rid of those loading antics
that you use.


What in the world are you babbling about now?
Which one of antennas are you referring to?
None of my antennas require loading "antics" except
my mobile whips.
All my others are manly full size antennas which require
no loading antics, equilibrium, or quivers in the force
to function properly.

I know you can work all you can hear but what about all
that your inefficient antenna is n0lt hearing?
Art


How would you know what I can work? You don't ever get
on the air. How do you know I even get on the air?
I might just leave it on all day and do nothing but look at the
lights and blinky things for all you know.
Also, I hate to break it to a whiney horses ass like you,
but none of my home antennas are inefficient.
Not a one. And I'd wager my mobile antenna is more
efficient than your shoe box sized 160m device.
I'm curious... Being you are so educated, how come a
dumbass uneducated hick like me has a bit better writing
skills than you? And English was probably my least
liked subject to boot... I slept through most all of
those classes as I recall.
Yet you spell resonance as rezonance.
You almost make me feel gifted in some way. :/
MK