View Single Post
  #6   Report Post  
Old March 29th 08, 05:17 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Dick Dick is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 70
Default icom ic-w32a vs. others

On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 07:57:37 -0700, Dick wrote:

On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 23:05:20 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Mar 28, 7:37 am, Alan WA4SCA wrote:
They are very popular with satellite operators, due to the full duplex
capability. Currently if you want full duplex, not just split band
operation, your only real choice is the Kenwood TH-7, which has a lot
of APRS functions as well.


So I looked at the Kenwood Th-D7A like you mentioned. I noticed the
manual says it's not capable of doing less than 438 Mhz.

Is this a hard rule with this device? Because a lot of the satellites
that I want to work are a little bit less than this. Like AO-51 which
has a downlink of 435.300 MHz.

As I've said, this is my first radio purchase so I just want to make
sure it will do what I want.

Any help is most appreciated.

-brad w.


According the the QST reviews of both the TH-D7A (Aug 1999) and the
TH-D7A(G) (Apr 2008) the transmitter frequency coverage as measured in
their lab is 430-450 MHz. Kenwood shows 438-450 MHz for both of them.

Dick - W6CCD


Just to verify the above, I set my TH-D7A(G) at 430 MHz and checked
the output against my HP frequency counter. No problem transmitting
at that frequency. I also verified that 430 is the bottom of the
range.

Dick - W6CCD

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from
http://www.teranews.com