Apparently Cecil, not Roger Sparks, wrote:

Roy Lewallen wrote:
Let me reiterate that the contents of the boxes can certainly be
distinguished with tests made at multiple frequencies. But the
objective of my comments has been to counter the claim that there's
some terminal property such as "electrical degrees" which the various
lines (box contents) have which is different at the single frequency
at which their reactances are the same. I hear this claim still being
made, but so far not any evidence to support it.

I provided the evidence in the thread titled,
"Please verify (or disprove)". You have yet
to respond to it. Here's your chance to nail
me to the wall for good, Roy. Why are you so
silent on that thread?

Please disregard my recent response.

There's still something strange about either my newsreader client or my
ISP. The quoted message, as you see, indicates that it was posted by
Roger Sparks, to whom I thought I was responding. But closer examination
shows that it was actually posted by Cecil. Consequently, my answer is
different. The reason I haven't responded is that I plonked Cecil quite
some time ago so I wouldn't be dragged into his tiresome and unending
alternate reality arguments. So unless someone quotes him (or the system
malfunctions, as it has here), I don't see his postings at all. And if
and when I do, I'm not inclined to respond. Other readers who disagree
with my postings on this topic are welcome to question it, and are
encouraged to look at the evidence given in all people's postings to
decide for themselves what the facts are.

I apologize to Roger Sparks for the misattribution.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL