Thread
:
Antenna physical size
View Single Post
#
151
April 2nd 08, 01:29 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Richard Clark
external usenet poster
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,951
Antenna physical size
On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 18:55:13 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:
Scaling of antennas is clearly
possible, despite of what the Chu-Harrington limit states ( or to be
fair, by applying them in a new way ).
But you don't know how, and have never seen one either.
That's true, I am not an expert in this field, I only try to stay up
to date with the technology, feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, but
I have seen many advancements in this direction lately.
Hi Robert,
It takes only one to convince us, not many. Choose your best example
and then we can correct your impression of it being representative of
a new advance in technology.
Or we can simply skip the example and say there have been no new
advances, only new designs (not the same thing). Those new designs do
not strain the limits of 100 year old theory. They are only new
because of scale. We are no longer confined to the 2000M band for
QSOs (and most of those new designs are set in the cM bands).
73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
Reply With Quote
Richard Clark
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Richard Clark