View Single Post
  #408   Report Post  
Old April 14th 08, 10:28 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Cecil Moore[_2_] Cecil Moore[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,521
Default The Rest of the Story

Keith Dysart wrote:
What is your explanation for this phenomenon?


You first! :-)

I suppose. If you are happy with energy equations that
don't balance.


My energy equations balance perfectly. Yours are the
energy equations that don't balance in violation of
the conservation of energy principle.

"It depends" was no answer - that was just mealy-mouthing.


Except, that it does depend.


Sounds more like religion than anything else.

You have to read more carefully. I did not use the word
dissipation.


You have to read more carefully. I used the word
"dissipation" and you disagreed with me. Please
read it again to verify that fact.

Since we don't know the internals of the source, we do not
know if it is dissipating or not.


Sorry, the source is, by definition, lossless. All of
the source dissipation is lumped in the source resistance
drawn separately on the diagram as Rs.

You really should rethink this a bit. When current flows into
a voltage source, the voltage source is absorbing energy.


But the source is NOT *DISSIPATING* energy because
Rs is not inside the source. Rs is clearly drawn outside
the lossless source so the source generates *ZERO* heat.
I am amazed at the lengths to which you will go to try
to obfuscate the discussion.

Changing the circuit changes the results, ...


When you get more serious about the technical facts
of physics than you are about saving face, please get
back to us, but please, not before. Everyone is
tired of your delusions of grandeur where the laws
of physics obey your every whim.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com