View Single Post
  #61   Report Post  
Old April 16th 08, 02:30 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
D Peter Maus D Peter Maus is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 962
Default Eduardo is just angry about the latest Arbitron study of theHD Radio farce

David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
iBiquity simply confirmed that the HD system was capable of
addressing receivers were this a requested feature. At present, I
do not believe any radio in production is addressable.


.

Nice try. That's not the suject of this convesation. And your
continuing attempt to divert the discussion to your denials of fact
say a lot about the intent of much of what you've posted in this
forum.



Right now, no chip and no receiver is adressable. in other words,
there is no way in hell to do paid services on HD today or in the
near future.



ROFLMAO.

Still avoiding the point. You're denying today what iBiquity
themselves have publicly have stated as a goal. And are currently
testing. And that's AUDIO, David. Not just data.



"Services that could be made possible through RadioGuard include

pay-per-listen options for live concerts or other events, improved
reading services for the blind, private channels for emergency services,
and free opt-in events sponsored by advertisers. So HD Radio will not
just be competing with satellite radio for listening time, but soon will
be competing for subscription dollars as well."



iBiquity themselves are proving you're not as intimately connected as
you claim. Which make your arguments shilling HD are largely irrelevant,
as either mis- or dis- information.