Eduardo is just angry about the latest Arbitron study of theHD Radio farce
David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
iBiquity simply confirmed that the HD system was capable of
addressing receivers were this a requested feature. At present, I
do not believe any radio in production is addressable.
.
Nice try. That's not the suject of this convesation. And your
continuing attempt to divert the discussion to your denials of fact
say a lot about the intent of much of what you've posted in this
forum.
Right now, no chip and no receiver is adressable. in other words,
there is no way in hell to do paid services on HD today or in the
near future.
ROFLMAO.
Still avoiding the point. You're denying today what iBiquity
themselves have publicly have stated as a goal. And are currently
testing. And that's AUDIO, David. Not just data.
I have never heard the supposed chant that the goal is to go all digital.
iBiquity made the system backward compatible on AM and FM, in fact.
Then you have exposed yourself as a fraud, Brother. iBiquity has stated
their goal was to make broadcasting all digital in their first press
release, and in damned near every appearance by Struble since.
If you're not aware of that, then you're not who, or what, you claim.
Anyone knows that pure digital is a decade away, if ever, on FM. And a
decade from now AM will likely not exist as we know it.
Once again, not the conversation at hand.
You really do act more like a shill, every day. Not really addressing
the point, but changing the subject to assert not that it's not
happening, but that it's not happening NOW. Your way of saying that we
should acceed to this strategy because the undesireable outcome is a
decade away.
LOL!.
You have exposed yourself for what you really are, David. And, in
the process, what you really are not.
Have a good evening.
p
Admitting,
|