In article
,
RHF wrote:

On Apr 27, 8:02*pm, Telamon
wrote:
In article
,

*Telamon wrote:
In article
,
*Telamon wrote:

SNIP

Must have a woman controlling the schedule and frequency that can't make
up her mind. Different day, different schedule

Radio New Zealand 30 Mar 2008 - 03 May 2008

UTC * kHz * Target *(Everyday)

0159-0458 * 15720 AM 13840 DRM * Pacific
0459-0658 * 11725 AM & 9890 DRM *Pacific
0659-1058 * 7145 AM & 6170 DRM * Pacific
1059-1258 * 9655AM & 6170 DRM NW Pacific, Bougainville, PNG, Timor
1300-1550 * 6170 AM from 16 Apr *Pacific
1551-1850 * 7145 AM & 6170 DRM * NE Pacific, Fiji, Samoa, Cook Islands
1851-1935 * 9615 AM & 9890 DRM * NE Pacific, Tonga, Fiji, Samoa
1936-1950 * 9615 AM & 11675 DRM *NE Pacific, Tonga, Fiji, Samoa
1951-2050 * 11725 AM & 11675 DRM Pacific
2051-2235 * 15720 AM 13840 DRM * NW Pacific, Vanuatu, Solomon Islands
2236-0158 * 13840 AM 15720 DRM * Pacific
-
- The woman in charge of the frequency schedule and the
- positioning of the furniture in the studio seems to have
- settled down a bit as the schedule has not changed in
- the last week.
-
- Reception today on 13,840 was not that good until about
- 01:00 UTC here where the DRM signal was strong on
- 15,740.
- DRM sure sucks.
- Anyway they are good since the switch to analog on 15,740.
-
- Meanwhile RA has been good for hours before that
- on 16 meters
- 17,715
- 17,785
- 17,795
- and then
- 15,515
-
- The RA schedule has some errors in it with the the
- wrong meter band indicated for the frequency.
- I also do not see 17,715 listed in the latest schedule.
-

Telamon,

Point-of-Fact -it is- Radio New Zealand International (RNZI)
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...f5db5b65aa7fb7
-not- [RNZ] Radio New Zealand; whish is properly referred
to as "Radio NZ"; and is the National Public Radio Service
of New Zealand.

Sort-of-Like : Radio Australia (RA) and ABC Radio for the
Australian Broadcasting Corporation's (ABC) Radio National
ABC RADIO - http://www.abc.net.au/radio/
ABC RADIO NATIONAL - http://www.abc.net.au/rn/
ABC - http://www.abc.net.au/rn/mission.htm

Plus that would be 13,840 kHz or 13.840 MHz
in the subject-line - it hertz to be right ~ RHF
.
-ps- glad to see you got the UTC thing right in the text.

It is a short wave news group retard so what else would 13,840 mean to
you?

Do I have to write KHz after every frequency in my post for you to be
happy?

Just so you understand I'll just continue to use RNZ if you don't mind.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California