Telamon wrote:

In article
,
RHF wrote:

On Apr 27, 8:02 pm, Telamon
wrote:
In article
,

Telamon wrote:
In article
,
Telamon wrote:

SNIP

Must have a woman controlling the schedule and frequency that can't make
up her mind. Different day, different schedule

Radio New Zealand 30 Mar 2008 - 03 May 2008

UTC kHz Target (Everyday)

0159-0458 15720 AM 13840 DRM Pacific
0459-0658 11725 AM & 9890 DRM Pacific
0659-1058 7145 AM & 6170 DRM Pacific
1059-1258 9655AM & 6170 DRM NW Pacific, Bougainville, PNG, Timor
1300-1550 6170 AM from 16 Apr Pacific
1551-1850 7145 AM & 6170 DRM NE Pacific, Fiji, Samoa, Cook Islands
1851-1935 9615 AM & 9890 DRM NE Pacific, Tonga, Fiji, Samoa
1936-1950 9615 AM & 11675 DRM NE Pacific, Tonga, Fiji, Samoa
1951-2050 11725 AM & 11675 DRM Pacific
2051-2235 15720 AM 13840 DRM NW Pacific, Vanuatu, Solomon Islands
2236-0158 13840 AM 15720 DRM Pacific
-
- The woman in charge of the frequency schedule and the
- positioning of the furniture in the studio seems to have
- settled down a bit as the schedule has not changed in
- the last week.
-
- Reception today on 13,840 was not that good until about
- 01:00 UTC here where the DRM signal was strong on
- 15,740.
- DRM sure sucks.
- Anyway they are good since the switch to analog on 15,740.
-
- Meanwhile RA has been good for hours before that
- on 16 meters
- 17,715
- 17,785
- 17,795
- and then
- 15,515
-
- The RA schedule has some errors in it with the the
- wrong meter band indicated for the frequency.
- I also do not see 17,715 listed in the latest schedule.
-

Telamon,

Point-of-Fact -it is- Radio New Zealand International (RNZI)
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...f5db5b65aa7fb7
-not- [RNZ] Radio New Zealand; whish is properly referred
to as "Radio NZ"; and is the National Public Radio Service
of New Zealand.

Sort-of-Like : Radio Australia (RA) and ABC Radio for the
Australian Broadcasting Corporation's (ABC) Radio National
ABC RADIO - http://www.abc.net.au/radio/
ABC RADIO NATIONAL - http://www.abc.net.au/rn/
ABC - http://www.abc.net.au/rn/mission.htm

Plus that would be 13,840 kHz or 13.840 MHz
in the subject-line - it hertz to be right ~ RHF
.
-ps- glad to see you got the UTC thing right in the text.

It is a short wave news group retard so what else would 13,840 mean to
you?

Do I have to write KHz after every frequency in my post for you to be
happy?

Just so you understand I'll just continue to use RNZ if you don't mind.

He's as bad as 'Eduardo' with the whole 'Radio Difusora' debacle.