"Telamon" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"Bart Bailey" wrote in message
...
In posted on Thu,
5
Jun 2008 05:17:21 -0700, David Eduardo wrote: Begin

That explains why you have no clue as to local media usage and
ratings, and probably why you don't understand earthquakes.

First, I don't care about artificial 'ratings'

If you owned or worked at a radio station, they would be one of your
primary concerns.

and second I do understand and care about real phenomena.

If you think people tune in to the radio during an earthquake, I
doubt even that.

That is the most stupid thing you have posted yet.

Think about my statement again. People "tune in" _after_ and earthquake, not
during it. My point is that, unlike hurricanes or tornado situations or
floods, there is no advance warning for a quake, and not enough time during
a quake to tune in. Tune in occurs after the incident, not during it.

In any case, most of the population does not use AM radio, mucho of it does
not even know AM exists. The first source of info is TV for most of the two
youngest generations of Americans. Not AM radio.