On Jun 22, 8:26 pm, Art Unwin wrote:
On Jun 22, 6:52 pm, "Walter Maxwell" wrote:



"Art Unwin" wrote in message

...

On Jun 22, 6:12 pm, "Wayne" wrote:
"Lumpy" wrote in message

... Walter Maxwell wrote:
Sorry if the posts offended you, Harold, but I'm flabbergasted that
Richard had the gall to post his denigration of my paper in the
newsgroup.

I'd simply like to know -
SNIP

Craig 'Lumpy' Lemke

www.n0eq.com

If you did a google on the author's name and perhaps the word "reflections",
you might get the answers to your questions. You might also discover that
it is related to antenna systems.
Yup. That is correct. this is the third time he has published this
book in the hope of finally getting it right
but apparently it is discredited before publishing by the antenna
group! expert

Art, I wish you'd get your facts straight before you post. To set the record
straight the 1st edition of Reflections sold out at 10,000 copies, the 2nd
edition at 3,000 copies, while the 3rd edition hasn't been published yet.
Nothing about anything pertaining to Reflections has been discredited. Who told
you it has been? If you'd like to look at a few of the chapters go to my web
page atwww.w2du.com.

Walt

I have your book and I don't think much of it. With respect to facts
Richard lied about the mathematical connection between Gauss and
Maxwell. Most of you believed him without checking the facts and I was
dissed. Then a doctor Davis came aboard and showed you where you were
wrong but now everybody was committed and dissed him also. Yes, I was
discredited on a lie , which he admitted to after I was victimised by
all. Now he has discredited your book and you on the basis of what you
call" lies". I got no apologies and neither did Dr Davis
and the lie you were part of goes on to this day. You ask for facts
you got them and they are still in the archives. You are calling the
kettle black. Get back to antennas and stop promoting yourself and
your third book which you claim is now right.You at least got some
reasons as to why your postings were dissed, for my troubles I got
nothing.It is evident that the majority of this newsgro0up do not like
the move under way to change the subject of antennas so why not try to
get along with your fellow posters
or move on?

By the way Walt you never came forward with the math to prove me wrong
preffering a hatchet job instead of doing the math. You never
apologised either
on continuing what I am sure you knew was a lie because of your
continual position
of being superior in mathematics. The position you took makes you an
accessory in the lie
because you knew it was a lie. You and your book have been dissed even
if you can prove that Richard lied again
but after the fact it is difficult to put things right. Instead of
telling me to read your page why not read
unwinantennas,com/ and the antenna group archives plus your own
history on postings to refresh yourself on the "facts" that you wish
for.
If you wish to make a rebuttal on the Gauss/Maxwell question be my
guest and point out why you disagreed even in the face of Richard
stating that he lied or are you committed to deeply now to reverse
course instead of revealing the truth because it may hurt?