On Jun 23, 10:07 am, Art Unwin wrote:
On Jun 23, 5:26 am, wrote:



On Jun 22, 8:48 pm, Art Unwin wrote:

I have your book and I don't think much of it. With respect to facts
Richard lied about the mathematical connection between Gauss and
Maxwell. Most of you believed him without checking the facts and I was
dissed. Then a doctor Davis came aboard and showed you where you were
wrong but now everybody was committed and dissed him also. Yes, I was
discredited on a lie , which he admitted to after I was victimised by
all. Now he has discredited your book and you on the basis of what you
call" lies". I got no apologies and neither did Dr Davis
and the lie you were part of goes on to this day. You ask for facts
you got them and they are still in the archives. You are calling the
kettle black. Get back to antennas and stop promoting yourself and
your third book which you claim is now right.You at least got some
reasons as to why your postings were dissed, for my troubles I got
nothing.It is evident that the majority of this newsgro0up do not like
the move under way to change the subject of antennas so why not try to
get along with your fellow posters
or move on?

By the way Walt you never came forward with the math to prove me wrong
preffering a hatchet job instead of doing the math.

Who cares.. You never gave any math to prove you are right.

You never
apologised either

Who cares... It's not his job to suck up to whiny little twits..

on continuing what I am sure you knew was a lie because of your
continual position
of being superior in mathematics.

I take this as an admission that your math may even be worse
than mine is? :/

The position you took makes you an
accessory in the lie
because you knew it was a lie.

But does he really care if it was or not?
I suspect he had better things to worry about.

You and your book have been dissed even
if you can prove that Richard lied again

This statement makes a lot of sense.. Almost
as much as a page full of your blabber about
equilibrium...

but after the fact it is difficult to put things right. Instead of
telling me to read your page why not read
unwinantennas,com/ and the antenna group archives plus your own
history on postings to refresh yourself on the "facts" that you wish
for.

I suspect he has little time to waste on sub par physics, and
thus sub par antennas..

If you wish to make a rebuttal on the Gauss/Maxwell question be my
guest and point out why you disagreed even in the face of Richard
stating that he lied or are you committed to deeply now to reverse
course instead of revealing the truth because it may hurt?

Hey whiny one. I'm your huckleberry!!! I'm fairly bored at times.
I can keep you busy until next Christmas if you really feel the
need for discussion. I don't need any help from the others.
I'll brown your food just from shear logic, and I won't even need
no stinking math to do it.
IE: I'd still like to hear about how a "static" particle can move,
twist, and do the universal tango. And don't tell me that Gauss
or equilibrium had anything to do with it.
Doktor Davis.. Thats a laugh.. I remember everything about
that adventure, and Art, *you* are the liar about that case.
I've seen bumps on a persons ass that were more useful
than Doktor Davis was to your case.
Rather than answer a few pertinent questions posed to him,
he did the duck and run, and has never been heard from since.

Frankly, I kind of surprised at all the whining here.
I don't think Walters post, or articles, or even books are
out of the topic range of this group.
And neither do I consider Richard Clarks posts either.
For some reason they have a difference of opinion,
and I think they should work it out to hopefully come
to a conclusion.
They can do it in private, or right here. I could care less.
I haven't kept up with whatever led up to all this, so
I'm not taking sides at all. Both may have valid points.

Some of the comments seem a bit strong to me..
I find some of the comments to Walter as pretty tacky.
To me, the posts *are* on topic. A heck of a lot
closer than worries about the demise of Usenet,
perpetual motion theories, tennis shoes, touchtone
mikes, BIG BROTHER, etc, ad nausium..
Some of you all need to chill down and relax..
Go drink some vodka. That will help calm the nerves.
Works for me.. I like it with grapefruit juice...
But thats just my 29 cents worth.

I understand your frausteration with antenna discussions but it is
extremely hard to communicate the mathematical side of antennas for
anybody who did not reach the high school graduation point, especially
when you refuse to try to find out the meaning of equilibrium.
I just finished a explanation of my antenna work on Eham so you have a
chance to get up to speed on the subject rather than the spewing
remarks that reflect your fraustration especially when other more
experienced people are doing the same.
Regards
Art
unwinantennas.com/

I dislike the way you slandered John E Davis ! He has only made a few
posts on this newsgroup which are readily obtainable.
He posted on this newsgroup purely to provide the equality of
mathematics of Maxwell and Gauss for which he is qaulified with a
doctrate from MIT working on astral matters for NASA. He made several
attempts to explain the math even in the face of caustic comments from
this group. After he had supplied the mathematics he then left the
newsgroup. He did not cut and run. He did what he set out to do and he
did it extremely well.
Since that time, months,Richard admitted that what Davis said was
true. No. He said of course it was true. Others that followed Richard
in that lie have never recanted preffering to continually to pljunge
the knife. I suggest you recover John's posts on the mathematics and
apologize