On Jun 23, 1:10 pm, Art Unwin wrote:


I dislike the way you slandered John E Davis !
I'll send you a quarter and you can call someone
who gives a @#$%..

He has only made a few
posts on this newsgroup which are readily obtainable.

I'm well aware of his posts. I've retrieved them for others
at least once or twice.

He posted on this newsgroup purely to provide the equality of
mathematics of Maxwell and Gauss for which he is qaulified with a
doctrate from MIT working on astral matters for NASA.

I don't care if he's Navin R. Johnson, he was still useless to
your cause.

He made several
attempts to explain the math even in the face of caustic comments from
this group. After he had supplied the mathematics he then left the
newsgroup.

I don't recall him giving out any math at all.

He did not cut and run. He did what he set out to do and he
did it extremely well.

Then why couldn't he answer the simple questions posed to him?
He did what he set out to do, which was to cover his ass, and
he did it extremely well.

Since that time, months,Richard admitted that what Davis said was
true. No. He said of course it was true.

I'd have to let Richard speak for himself. I recall no such thing.

Others that followed Richard
in that lie have never recanted preffering to continually to pljunge
the knife. I suggest you recover John's posts on the mathematics and
apologize

You are not in a position to suggest anything. You can't even get
off your rear to fire up a rig and test an antenna when requested
to do so. If this were not the case, you would know your antenna is a
pseudo dummy load from prior experience, and we wouldn't be having
this usenet QSO.