On Jul 1, 7:16 pm, "Dave" wrote:
"Art Unwin" wrote in message

...

On Jul 1, 4:37 pm, John Smith wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
the use of free speech
without content
Regards
Art

Exactly what art is best at!

David ,you have never won a debate on this newsgroup and you never
will.
You are just another Andy Cap waving hands espousing various
falsehoods.
You have never come up with anything of cosequence that was factual in
the face of disagreement. Never!
And it is too late in life for you to correct it You can still live
happilly ever after if you stop pretending you are what you are not
Your sparcity of knoweledge becomes evident as you exercise the
priviledge of free speech which is why I am a supporter of free
speech ., If you were knowledgable in the art and mathematics you
would have shown the World how a relationship between Gauss and
Maxwell could never be. If you were knowledgable in the arts you would
have explained the eddy current but again you can't. If you were
knoweledgable in antenna programs you would be aware of arrays in
equilibrium but you can't. If you were aware that radiators do not
have to be straight under Maxwellian law you would have but you cant.
If you were aware of magnetic fields that something in air you would
have mentioned it but you didn't. Fact is you do not have the
mathematics knowledge to disprove these things or the get up and go to
make an antenna in equilibrium to prove anything and the measuring of
its oscillations with respect to SWR is certainly beyond your
capability.Carry on with your free speech as I find it so
representitive of what you actually are without further investigation.
Art