View Single Post
  #12   Report Post  
Old July 4th 08, 12:51 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Art Unwin Art Unwin is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,339
Default Radiation and dummy loads

On Jul 3, 5:16 pm, Art Unwin wrote:
On Jul 3, 4:58 pm, John Smith wrote:



Dale Parfitt wrote:
"Art Unwin" wrote in message
...
On Jul 3, 12:25 pm, wrote:
On Jul 3, 11:08 am, Art Unwin wrote:


Following the logic of my posting it shows a clear conflict between
normal thinking and mine.


The operative words being "normal thinking and mine (Art's)"


That about sums it up.


Well, yes and no ...


When you consider that the "normal IQ" is between 100-110 for the USA,
as a whole, and depending on the area in question (a survey onboard a
quality campus would blow that out of the water--and an IQ of 120+ used
to automatically qualify you for OTS (other qualifications
pending/applying) ... one could come up with a scenario(s) where
"normal" is not, necessarily, all that desirable ...


Regards,
JS


Correct........ Normal in America is to strive to be a lemming
I can't be normal as it takes me more than one try to discern the
characters in the picture
which is needed before one can post

'
You know John, since America gives the 'right to bear arms' you would
think that the population would understand
that a projectile must have rotation to follow a straight line
trajectory.
Straight line trajectory is also a property of radiation, so we not
only have to eject particles at rest
from a radiator surface but we also have to apply 'twist' to the
ejected particle otherwise the particles will scatter!
Again the foucault or eddy currents come to the fore where their
circulatory action apply torgue to the ejected particle
Why is it so hard for Americans to understand that radiation is a
result of radial ejection of particles via a rejective rotary magnetic
field ?. Especially when particles in equilibrium is part and parcel
of Gaussian law which when extended to the same environment as the
Maxwellian law? Today we have total resistance to this evidence and
instead prefer to act like lemmings rather than face change.
Regards
Art
I haven't purchased a ARRL publication for years but I suspect they
are still talking of radiation as being wave form.