derek wrote:
On Jul 6, 7:14 pm, wrote:


Doc
most posters who disagree with Art on this thread at least put
up an alternative to Art's claim's, you on the other hand have nothing
to offer as usual, so instead you attack the man as you did in times
past to no effect. The fellow ******* who used to follow are no longer
around, you are on your own!.
In my neck of the woods Doc's who are not on top of their subjects
are known as quack's, so I suggest before you post again you bone up
on the subject in question, or are you so far out of your depth that
you are only able to attack the man?.

Arthur doesn't provide specifics. He doesn't provide the math. He is
short on fact and long on misspelled pontification. Excuse me if I
don't accept his wild claims at face value. If he can't explain them
(and the burden of proof is on him), why should any of us be bothered?

Dave K8MN