"Telamon" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"Telamon" wrote in message
...

Don't give any of Eduardo's posts the benefit of the doubt. All that
guy
does is spread BS in the news group. He does not know what he is
talking
about. Nothing stops this guy from spewing his BS. He even has the
audacity to tell you what you can hear on your radio. Just ask him.


You still don't get it, do you.

SNIP

The BS meter is reading 40 over S9.

Believe me I get it Eduardo. I get that you are the BS master of this
news group.

Actually, you are in total and irrational denial. The fact that signals can
be picked up does not mean, unless they are very strong, they will be
listened to.

That's a fact. A provable one. Drive to Glendale and I will quickly show you
how we can compare coverage with ZIP code listening for any market and prove
this fact that you want to deny.

Analysis by all the major broadcast companies shows that outside of the very
intense signal areas, on both AM and FM, there is essentially no urban area
listening.

Yet you deny the facts.

The database for this consists of a sample size several thousand times that
of the typical political poll, and has been proven over and over.

And you deny the facts.

The prices for hundred-million dollar radio stations are in part determined
by the number of people in the "listenable signal" contours.

But you deny it.

And your only defense is to call a basic rule of the radio industry BS.