David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
news
David Eduardo wrote:
Why do you refuse to believe facts an entire industry is guide by?
Instead of examining the facts, you hurl insults.

Because he, like the rest of us, doesn't accept the premise that an
industry licensed "to serve in the public interest as a public trustee"
may unilaterally make performance commitments based exclusively on a
bottom line.

We are discussing where listening takes place. Not profitability.


Go back and read carefully, you asked why. I told you why.


And this is where we fundamentally differ. You don't listen.

Read it again, Pancho. See if you can find the hidden meaning. I'll
give you a hint...it's right in front of your face.


You want to know why he refuses to accept your 'facts?' Because he's
not sure you listened to him enough to really understand what his gripe
is.

So far, in the last two years, you've only quoted margins, stock
prices, statistics and agendae. You've argued with everything that's
been put before you, even when it agrees with what you've said.

What you've not done....not one time, is simply listen. And then
address what's been said. Instead of returning to script and quoting
your manufactured facts.

It's like I said a year ago, if you came down and actually
participate in a discussion as a member of the group, instead of
spitting pedantry every time you open your keyboard, you'd probably get
a lot more of your message heard.

But you don't seem to be able to discuss without the pedantic
reliance on corporate speak and what Eric Richards called (with some
accuracy) pseudo-statistical double talk.

Drop the pedantry and oblique insults and see if you don't get
somewhere.