On Jul 12, 12:15 pm, "Frank" wrote:
I certainly have no idea what Franks response to RCs post signifies
either
What a mess occurs when one solely tries to deceive!
I am ready for a couple of quiet days out of town despite the cost of
Gauss

The idea was to model your antenna. The code is there for anyone to
verify in case I have made an error. The model results, including
input impedance, and gain, are shown below the code listing.
The GH card is in NEC 4 format. All other cards conform to
NEC 2.

73,

Frank

My program is not Nec based so I am not familiar with that routine.,
I cant model my antenna because of the pre twisted wires. I can
however
model a combination of two helix antennas without interweaving into
one circuit.
where one helix antenna is slightly larger diameter than the other
My program shows instances of gain! So the question becomes is your
model
based on zip cord which is suggested by one and secondly what was the
reason for the combimation of two antennas
to shrivle away into dust or the equivalent of a dummy load. It is
also suggested that antennas such as this
are breaking the laws of nature so does your program show the arrival
of doom ?.
I am making this antenna very frequently and all these things
predicted are just not happening. But then I would never use
zip cord or violate the rules of nature if I was advised which one I
was violating but apparently that is a secret.
So Frank what is the antenna configuration etc that your program
represents so that I can understand the particulars that you have so
genouresly probided so all may share