Rrrado Rn wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
A Brown wrote:
Again, if you take an argument to its absurdity, you're not
discussing what's actually on the table. By definition, you're arguing
non-Real issues.
He's taking the point you are making and putting it to the test....which
shows the shallowness of your argument.
Actually, he's ignoring the argument in favor of the absurdity.

He's pointing out the absurdity of your argument.



No, he's not. He's extrapolating the argument beyond it's context to
absurdity.

And then arguing the absurdity.

He's not actually addressed the point. Only the absurdity of his
extrapolation, which by definition is not based in any reality.