Michael Coslo wrote:

...
To be completely fair, they relied on cause and effect, which is to say
that they noticed a lot of people who smoked and chewed ended up with
these diseases.

But deep pockets kept tangling things up until testing came along that
not only showed that they caused the diseases, but the pathways, and
how, and in a 100 percent unambiguous way.

If we were to apply the same rationale and proof to say, falling out of
airplanes at 30 thousand feet, the argument would be " Well, can you
prove that the person died form the fall, or did they perhaps die of
fright on the way down? Can you testify with a certainty that is what
happened? As if the exact mechanism being indeterminate means the
activity should be promoted, when we all know that whatever the exact
cause of death, if you do fall out at that height, it ain't gonna be too
happy of an ending.

- 73 de Mike N3LI -

You are quite correct, as are the others comments in the same direction(s.)

Now, having been "burnt", in the past, by gov't, medicine, big money,
power and "the media", can you look around and see these exact same
tactics in use today? And, what percentage of the population is so
stupid they make no use of past history which recorded these lies and so
sadly demonstrated those lies ability to do much damage and death?

I will give you this--I feel it is a HIGH percentage!

"But you tell me
Over and over and over again, my friend
Ah, you don’t believe
We’re on the eve
of destruction." -- Barry McGuire, Eve of Destruction.

Regards,
JS