On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:13:01 -0400, Michael Coslo
wrote:

Who here would tape a wire to their child's head with up to a watt of
power running through it at those freq's ? Child protective services
would probably declare you unfit, take the kids away from you,

Hi Mike,

Child protective services probably would do that even if you NEVER put
ANY rf through the wire. They would react to the obvious issue of
abusive behavior. They haven't got a clue what RF would do, and they
wouldn't distinguish between 1W or 1µW as being good, bad, or
indifferent; and it would be the height of absurdity to expect them to
rummage through their car trunk for exposure meters to figure that out
when they are faced with a wacko and nothing more needs to be sorted
out.

Again, this sort of logic (sic) merely perpetuates the nonsense Brett
Gump loves to forward through these threads.

I can imagine the drift of topic would speculate they would idly stand
by and wait for proof positive that the adult had finally warmed up
the Henry and threw the switch before they were legally obligated to
do what was long obvious.

and you'd
probably have to register as something or another so you could be
tracked down if needed.
Using an ankle cuff with an RF link. Now, apparently, what is
dangerous to the head is entirely benign to the foot - tell this to a
diabetic. Care to assume the liability for this suggestion? Does the
hint of cuffs pinching your wrists come to mind?

This is the absurdity of Brett's Yellow Journalism research and how
the topic has drifted from the technical to the superstitious. Mike,
do you care to respond to my technical comment of 3 days ago, or is
this deviant speculation really that more relevant to anything?

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC