JB wrote:
...
Look if you really want the RF evaluation done, I need to charge you for it.
I could show you where you are wrong in your calculation, verify what is
correct and you can do what you want with it. It will cost you even more if
I have to actually measure the power bandwidth and density of the actual
unit.
You spoke earlier about widespread corruption and no trust beyond your fear.
I can understand suspicion, but your fear is largely based on the unknown.
It might help you to consider that manufacturers are largely motivated by
greed, so it would be absurd to worry that they would spend the extra money
to exceed the FCC specifications for maximum output, although I'm sure that
there are individuals who would spend the extra money for an amplifier. I
would suspect that sales would get their money and the customer would be
sent to the complaint department to get their money's worth and the
responsibility would fall.
http://infotech.awardspace.com/
Ahhh, you are an idiot!
You will have to excuse me. Yanno, sometimes you just run into that
rare circumstance where, at first the person "seems normal." After a
bit of dialog, however, you realize "there is no one home ...
1) They (cell phones) DON'T exceed the maximum allowed--and THAT IS
SCARY! (1.6W per Kg ... how much does your head weigh?)
2) An amplifier would do you little good unless you could also increase
the output on the cell tower ... but then, I don't like burnt toast! ;-)
3) The "damage" we "debate" is of such a nature, it could only be found
it statistical studies--all studies to date are flawed ...
4) I expect "this problem" to take longer sorting out than the the
tobacco problem/danger. How many deaths from tobacco alone?
5) Massive corruption, greed and loss of trust, that is in question?
What else do you call it when the will of the people is constantly
ignored; and when all-else-fails, the courts are called in to make a
decision that the will of the people is NOT constitutional! (Rather
illogical when the constitution takes justification from "we the people
...." I believe that same justification is used in the California law.)
6) New Orleans has still not recovered, despite "federal help", many are
still without homes--google it! If it were in another country, we could
have emergency supplies anywhere in the world in a matter of days and
begin helping rebuild in a matter of weeks ... more goes on in Oz than
meets than eye ... the terrorists only need to walk across the
border--good for us they are too stupid to figure that out ... I guess.
PLONK!
Regards,
JS