Richard Clark wrote:
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 19:11:49 GMT, "JB" wrote:

I more subscribe to the theory that witnesses who died defending their own
observation, are more compelling than those who would have written for any
other reason.

This would be profound, if it weren't coming from an "anonymous"
source replying in other side threads to an "anonymous" source.

Two such "anonymous" sources in a series of dialog is very much less
than compelling and lacks all reason.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Hi Richard,
Both sources need the tinfoil changed on their respective
hats. They also need to find a newsgroup where they can discuss popular
theology without danger of being withered by ridicule from the other
participants.
73,
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH