Telamon wrote:
In article ,
Dave wrote:

wrote:
On Aug 30, 6:44 am, Dave wrote:
Stuff it, Nazi breath.- Hide quoted text -

The audacity of a Dr. Dave, the definition of a Liberal Fascist -
LOL! http://www.reason.com/blog/show/124122.html
Liberals, by definition, cannot be fascists. Fascism is the opposite of
liberalism.

Actually it is possible.

Let's say the Demon-cats that call themselves liberals are in fact both
elitists and fascists. In other words they comprise the ruling elite
and they give themselves freedom and power because as the elite they
deserve it, but the populous doesn't. This would be a dictatorship by a
small group of people known as the ruling elite. Witness Al Gore's
actions and what he preaches for everyone else as an example of how
this group of people views their life as opposed to your life.

For the populous they will give amoral latitude to keep them busy,
weak, and ever more dependent on government handouts due to poor
choices made by individuals in an amoral society white taxing them to
death and redistributing the money power as they deem fit. This from of
control has been working well the last few decades.

And so it goes until the wheels come off.

There is no better example than the military-industrial-governmental
complex that now has us by the short and curlies. They have robbed the
Treasury dry; and left you and me with nothing but bills to pay.