"Art Unwin" wrote in message
...
On Sep 12, 6:18 am, "Dave" wrote:
"Art Unwin" wrote in message

David, what I have stated is based on known laws and phenomina and
started with the recognision
that applying a time varying field and radiators to a Gaussian field
equates to Maxwell's laws.
Right from the start you could not concentrate on proving or
disproving that statement !

around and around we go... i quoted the required passages from jackson and
ramo/whinnery/vanduzer to show that adding time to gauss'es law was
incorrect. the law is time independent, meaning it does not require a time
term, it applies for all time instantaneously and it is properly included in
maxwell's equations as is. your addition of 't' is not necessary. proof
is not necessary, it is by definition and intuitively obvious to anyone with
the proper background.