On Sep 12, 2:41*pm, "Dave" wrote:
"Art Unwin" wrote in message

...

I await the day when a ham comes along with sufficient education to
verify or discredit the Maxwell/Gauss
mathematics but I know a ham is not around in the U.S. that can
discredit it.

of course not, we are all educated enough to know the proper relationship
between gauss and maxwell, and the fact that gauss's law is an accepted part
of maxwell's equations... and works fine just as it is without your extra
't' added to it. *it would take someone graduating from the warped art's
college of mystical electromagnetics with an advanced degree in
neutrino-anti-gravity-weak-force-jumping-particles to handle that proof!

David you have had every chance of exposing mathematical error when
the proof
was presented on this newsgroup site. Every point of rebuttal
presented was shown to be in error
It was not provided by me but by a mathematician skilled in the trade,
with a doctorate, working on a NASA project at M.I.T
who came to my defence and showed the mathematical proof. Did you
report the good doctor to the Dean of M.I.T. and NASA
declaring him unfit as seen by your eyes. What credentials did you
present on your own behalf to provide credibility to your
observations ?
Did you mention your finding was based on...........well.......well
because..........well because it was me that said so.................
well I don't have to explain it to you.....................I KNOW HE
IS INCOMPETANT!!!!!................YOU ARE A FOOL DEAN......