On Sep 12, 2:41*pm, "Dave" wrote:
"Art Unwin" wrote in message

...

I await the day when a ham comes along with sufficient education to
verify or discredit the Maxwell/Gauss
mathematics but I know a ham is not around in the U.S. that can
discredit it.

of course not, we are all educated enough to know the proper relationship
between gauss and maxwell, and the fact that gauss's law is an accepted part
of maxwell's equations...


No,No,No. I understand that Maxwell only used the Mathematics to
encapsulate
observations from about 28 contributors most of which were duplicates.
He never extended Gauss law of statics to express the mathematical
results that he came up with. Extending Gaussian law by adding a
radiator and a time varying field
provides all that Maxwell presented. On top of that it supplies
pictures where radiation can be
isolated and solved where as Maxwell only supplied numbers which
included the requirement
of equilibrium as stated by all contributors which is a reflection of
Newton's laws
all of whichcan be determined by transitioning from a static field to
a dynamic field he d.
Are you going to rewrite history?






and works fine just as it is without your extra
't' added to it. *it would take someone graduating from the warped art's
college of mystical electromagnetics with an advanced degree in
neutrino-anti-gravity-weak-force-jumping-particles to handle that proof!