On Sep 12, 7:08*pm, "Dave" wrote:
"Art Unwin" wrote in message

...
On Sep 12, 11:39 am, "Dave" wrote:

Oh David I extended it to make it dynamic by adding a time varying
current *where it duplicates Maxwells law

so you had to extend a set of equations that you say is giving proper
results as they were written oh so long ago and have been implemented in all
sorts of antenna modeling software that you say works just fine... so what
did your extension do? *if the software works as is without your changes to
the equations then how are your changes necessary? *what does your change to
them predict that isn't already in there?? *since you didn't write your own
software, but are fond of quoting results of whatever you use, then
obviously your change wasn't necessary and yet you rely on it... very
strange... and no, its still raining and should be raining all weekend... so
keep ranting... i still want to know about the neutrinos and how they settle
on plasmas that are decidedly not diamagnetic and cause them to radiate.


IF YOU DO NOT PRE GUIDE IT TO A PLANAR DESIGN WHICH DOES NOT INCLUDE
THE WEAK FORCE
IT WILL SUPPLY A BETTER RADIATOR BY ADDING THE WEAK FORCE TO SUPPLY
REQUIREMENTS ASKED OF IT
PER MAXWELLS LAWS AND NOT BY YAGI APPROACH. I.E ASK FOR MAX GAIN AND
THE PROGRAM CHOOSES.
ART