On Sep 17, 9:58*am, "JB" wrote:
That was what I got out of it ... but then, I focused on Arts'
observation, "One thing is certain, Gauss states that static particles
cannot radiate in free space as there is no exchange of flux ... "

Static particles? * Does he mean statically charged particles? *They don't
radiate, they are attracted to opposite charged matter. *But then there is
ionization of a substance.

JB
If I called those particles Neutrinos all hell would break out again
as in the past
I am refering to the Gaussian law of statics without comment of how I
could see
things differently from Gauss. Some would like to state them with
reference to charge
some another way. The medium that I take is static particles very
simple and understood by all
but then an opening for an auguement about a correction required.
Go figure
Art