On Sep 16, 4:07*pm, Art Unwin wrote:
On Sep 16, 3:39*pm, "Wayne" wrote:

"Art Unwin" wrote in message

...Iconsi der it a real shame that equilibrium is not a part of
examinations since equilibrium
is a basic in the electrical circuit of all antennas No where do I see
antennas explained other than the showing of capacitive coupling to
ground of antennas as a perceived circuit of an antenna?. Until this
is corrected we will never have continium of discussion between hams
on antennas.It is not a mystery anymore so why do the ARRL avoid it
like a plague?
Art

-
My engineering training is many years old now, but I haven't seen
equilibrium in the context of antennas discussed anywhere except by you, in
this newsgroup. *Do you have any references to papers that have been peer
reviewed and published?

Oh I suppose a search on google re antennas and equilibrium will get
you something to read
but difficult if you are starting from Zero. The point where you begin
is Newtons laws, if they are in error then so am I
I doubt if you will find anything that definitely proves that he is
wrong.If a professor does not know what I have stated he should be
nfired
which goes for some of the people at *University of Illinois in the
electrical engineering area.
EVERYTHING in science revolves around equilibrium. If a posting denys
that or does not respond to that Law
i will not respond and that includes Richard whose sole aim in life if
to divert the crowd with off topic nothings as he does not ahve any
Wayne
engineering degree from any accredited college and thus is a
pretender
looking for a date with any poster.
Art
Wayn e I stated that I started at the point of first principles which
is Newton and I went from there.
There is not a book that I know that starts there. You want a lst of
authors that physics examiners look for to determine
what"famous " people will side with him if he accepts it. That lesson
is not lost on all that aspire to heights in the academic world
so a paper MUST be buillt on the works of others whose work has been
accepted. In my case I start at a point where the shoulders that I
stand aupon are all dead. I made reference to Newton only and I havent
got a list of supporters. So I start at the beginning with just one
name in consideration to isolate the point of possible error. The ARRL
infers the circuit is the capacitance to ground where as I put the
cuircuit as going thru the center of the conductor.
I dont see the need to bring in quantum physics or to speculate about
photons or massless items or how many gears that they can race thru to
obtain
the speed of light. I was not an electrical engineer and I am not
wired like Richard as I have a wife and I am a great grandpa and no
wish to be any part of his world. My subject is and will always be
until in someway I am satisfied is what is the electrical circuit of a
fractional wavelength antenna which is not specifically stated in the
books and where every poster is waiting for somnebody else to dip his
toe in the water and thus avoid any subsequent
verbal thrashing. I can never point to a list of supporting evidence
beyond Newton and his laws.
Best regards.....I have to cut an acre of grass with a hand mower as
my daily excercise yes I do have a tractor but that is not excercise
Art